InkscapeForum.com

*bumping for additional svg attachment in original post*

Hi.

Just edit the first posts's title with a "[Solved]" tag. Moderators can do the same thing as well if needed.

Hope1 wrote:Welcome indeed! Cool to stay around here

As long as you don't bump topics for no apparent reason and/or advertise your nonrelated blog it's quite ok I guess...

Welcome aboard!

It's nice to have developers around, may this opening be fruitful for you, for the project and of course for the community.

(Hope the approving latency isn't too large.

graphsnet wrote:Hello,

hope you have spent long time in inkscape,i can recommend https://graph.net infographics site which meet your area of interest

You mean graphs.net? Your link doesn't work in its current form. Which may be a good thing though of the borderline spam content.

Link disabled.

Ok, if the original poster won't chime in I'll delete it in a few days.

tylerdurden wrote:Reported as SPAM.

Saw that, was the one who approved the first post.
Hesitated to do so but at least it's not totally unrelated to inkscape?

I liked these type of filters Oh the irony in this one is solid. I'm making these filters -and also filtering the first posts. You'd been disapproved more times than anyone else. Had asked in pm why are you so desperate. No reply ever since. It's not about those loudspeakers you are try...

Yes. No more annoying delay from that aspect.

..this moderation phase for posting is annoying too :p It may be so but it's effective. Before the first 2 posts approval system it was 100+ spam posts a day, flooding the boards by instant. Latency is no longer than a few hours the most. But if that is still annoying, try the irc channel #inkscape...

As far as I know attachments are not allowed on every board on this forum.
Maybe time to move this topic to the help section.

Edit: done. Also edited the first message so it may get more focus.

Closing this topic for the topic's sake.

-For anyone seeing this topic as it is, it is an offspring from this topic.

Yes, saw that too.

In this topic, the attachment was downloaded 100+ times when the topic was viewed 24 times only.
Now the download is at 117 and the pageview counter at 48.

It was Moulelly, not OP -hence all the edited in quotes.

brynn wrote:What link? Did someone remove it?

Oh, I guess there was another message with a link?

Was put in the signature. User removed without further warning.

Also affected this topic

recharging the void

You would be surprised if you knew how many spammers still come through. At least the first post approval system prevents those hitting the public boards in a sudden. Didn't know it is now the measurement tool, the tweak tool was the question previously. Either microUgly or Xav changed the question.

Lazur URH wrote:Edit: quite good, it seems.

Time to change the signature.

For those moderating -either with this profile or not-, see some technical recommendations here.

hulf2012 wrote:and now what?

Depends on how good job the red witch have done.

Edit: quite good, it seems.

All is there except the username. Or is that inside the "profile field" category?

Technically speaking once the "ban hammer" option is confirmed it redirects to the user's profile with the option of banning it again.
Sort of like if the database didn't update.